Stop the wrong people getting in. Catch the ones who do.
VERISCO builds two security products that cover the whole path an attacker takes. Shield controls the front door. Alertio watches everything behind it.
| Time | Account | Origin | Device | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09:52:11 | n.haddad | DZ · Algiers | 62 | step_up |
| 09:48:02 | s.brahimi | DZ · Oran | 91 | allow |
| 09:41:37 | unknown | RU · datacentre | — | block |
| 09:30:15 | a.meziane | FR · Lyon | 88 | allow |
| 09:22:49 | k.saidi | DZ · Constantine | 74 | allow |
Read from the control plane serving this page within the last 60 seconds. Platform-wide totals only — no tenant, account or location is identifiable here.
Most teams buy one product per function, then spend the year making them talk.
We built both sides against the same idea of what an identity is.
Who gets in
Identity, device posture, network origin and session state, evaluated before a request reaches your application.
What got through
Every alert scored against a transparent model, and scattered events assembled into kill-chain incidents worth an analyst's time.
What you do next
One-click actions, multi-step playbooks, and signed response scripts deployed to the fleet — carried back to the endpoint.
Identity, without migration.
Adding SSO, MFA and audit logging to an application that already has users normally means rewriting the auth layer or migrating every account. Both are expensive, and both are irreversible.
Shield puts a managed identity layer in front of the application and leaves the user database exactly where it is — verified read-only, against your own MySQL or LDAP.
Take VERISCO away and the application still has all of its users.
How Shield works| Time | Account | Origin | Device | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09:52:11 | n.haddad | DZ · Algiers | 62 | step_up |
| 09:48:02 | s.brahimi | DZ · Oran | 91 | allow |
| 09:41:37 | unknown | RU · datacentre | — | block |
| 09:30:15 | a.meziane | FR · Lyon | 88 | allow |
| 09:22:49 | k.saidi | DZ · Constantine | 74 | allow |
Wazuh detects. Alertio understands.
A detection engine produces thousands of undifferentiated alerts a day, ranked only by a rule severity that knows nothing about which machine was hit, or whether this event is one step in a longer attack.
Alertio adds the layer that decides what deserves a human — a transparent score with the arithmetic shown, and correlation that assembles scattered events into a story.
Seven events, four sensors, two network zones — one incident.
How Alertio works| Time | Alert | Host | Severity | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09:52 | Domain admin group modified | DC-01 | critical | 94 |
| 09:31 | SQL injection on web tier | WEB-02 | high | 74 |
| 09:20 | Kerberoast request burst | DC-01 | high | 71 |
| 09:14 | IMAP brute force | MAIL-01 | medium | 58 |
| 08:58 | Port scan from external host | GW-01 | low | 31 |
Both products are working systems.
Neither is a prototype or a mockup with a demo mode. Every figure on this site was counted from the source, and both codebases run in CI on every push.
- Tested where it matters
- 108 automated suites across the two products, including a 243-case policy matrix replayed byte-for-byte in CI on every change.
- Auditable without trusting us
- Shield keeps a hash-chained audit log and ships an offline verifier that imports nothing from the platform, so the other party can check it alone.
- Honest about limits
- Both products document what they cannot do. Alertio does not respond automatically, and that is a safety decision rather than an omission.
Talk to us about a deployment.
Access is granted by invitation while we are onboarding early clients. Tell us what you run and we will get back to you.